SubjectsPolymer TestingLesson 04 · Impact Testing: Izod vs Charpy Pendulum Dynamics & Fracture Mechanics
Testing & QA/QCLesson 0419 PPE Syllabus Aligned

Impact Testing: Izod vs Charpy Pendulum Dynamics & Fracture Mechanics

Understand how impact resistance — a property tensile testing cannot measure — is quantified using Izod and Charpy pendulum tests, and why this single property often determines real-world product failure.

~35 min technical deep-dive·Standard Indian Curricula (CIPET / Anna Univ / ICT)

01 · Why This Matters in Industry & GATE XE-F

Applied directly across petrochemical refining, compounding plants, mold-flow simulations, and automotive part manufacturing (e.g., Reliance Industries, Supreme Petrochem, IOCL, CIPET testing protocols).

1

Molecular Mechanism: Master conformational physics, transition temperatures, and reaction kinetics.

2

Process & Quality: Predict viscosity behavior, solve molding defects, and apply ASTM/ISO testing standards.

02 · Technical Theory & Governing Equations

Impact Testing: Izod vs Charpy Pendulum Dynamics & Fracture Mechanics

Thermal analysis laboratory equipment - Visual reference for Impact Testing: Izod vs Charpy Pendulum Dynamics & Fracture Mechanics
Thermal analysis laboratory equipment - Visual reference for Impact Testing: Izod vs Charpy Pendulum Dynamics & Fracture Mechanics

1. Why This Topic Matters

Polymer components subjected to sudden mechanical impacts (drop impact, collision, shock loading) must resist brittle fracture. Pendulum Impact Testing—via Izod and Charpy methods—measures the energy absorbed during rapid crack propagation across a standardized notched specimen. Understanding notch sensitivity, ductile-to-brittle transition temperature (DBTTDBTT), and the non-interchangeable differences between ASTM and ISO test standards is critical for automotive bumper and protective helmet material selection.

2. Learning Objectives

By completing this lesson, you will be able to:

  • Differentiate Izod (cantilever beam) and Charpy (three-point supported beam) testing geometries.
  • Calculate absorbed impact energy (EabsorbedE_{absorbed}) and impact strength.
  • Compare ASTM D256 (extJ/m ext{J/m}) and ISO 180 / ISO 179 (extkJ/m2 ext{kJ/m}^2) units and notch radii.
  • Diagnose notch sensitivity and brittle failure modes.

3. Test Geometry & Pendulum Dynamics

mermaid
graph TD
    A["Pendulum Released from Initial Height h1"] --> B["Impact Striker Strikes Notched Specimen"]
    B --> C{"Testing Configuration"}
    C -->|"Izod Method (ASTM D256 / ISO 180)"| D["Vertical Cantilever Beam (Struck on Notched Face Side)"]
    C -->|"Charpy Method (ISO 179)"| E["Horizontal Simply Supported Beam (Struck Opposite Notch)"]
    D --> F["Pendulum Swings to Reduced Height h2"]
    E --> F
    F --> G["Absorbed Energy E = m*g*(h1 - h2) - Friction Losses"]

4. Equations & Recalculated Impact Energy

Pendulum Energy Equation

Potential energy absorbed by specimen fracture:

Eabsorbed=mg(h1h2)EwindageE_{absorbed} = m \cdot g \cdot (h_1 - h_2) - E_{windage}

Unit Formats: ASTM vs ISO Standards

Core Engineering Takeaway

[!CAUTION] Never Interchange ASTM and ISO Impact Values:

  • ASTM D256 (Izod) reports impact energy per unit notch length (extJ/m ext{J/m}):
Impact StrengthASTM=Eabsorbedb(J/m)\text{Impact Strength}_{ASTM} = \frac{E_{absorbed}}{b} \quad (\text{J/m})
Core Engineering Takeaway
  • ISO 180 (Izod) / ISO 179 (Charpy) reports impact energy per unit cross-sectional area under notch (extkJ/m2 ext{kJ/m}^2):
Impact StrengthISO=Eabsorbedb(ha)×103(kJ/m2)\text{Impact Strength}_{ISO} = \frac{E_{absorbed}}{b \cdot (h - a)} \times 10^3 \quad (\text{kJ/m}^2)

Where bb = specimen width (0.0032extm0.0032 ext{ m}), hh = total thickness (0.0127extm0.0127 ext{ m}), aa = notch depth (0.00254extm0.00254 ext{ m}).

Worked Numerical Example:

Problem: A Polycarbonate notched Izod specimen (b=3.20 mm=0.0032 mb = 3.20\text{ mm} = 0.0032\text{ m}, depth under notch ha=10.16 mm=0.01016 mh - a = 10.16\text{ mm} = 0.01016\text{ m}) absorbs Eabsorbed=2.10 JoulesE_{absorbed} = 2.10\text{ Joules} during fracture. Calculate impact strength under both ASTM D256 and ISO 180 formats.

Solution:

  1. Calculate ASTM D256 Impact Strength (extJ/m ext{J/m}):
Impact StrengthASTM=2.10 J0.00320 m=656.25 J/m\text{Impact Strength}_{ASTM} = \frac{2.10\text{ J}}{0.00320\text{ m}} = 656.25\text{ J/m}
  1. Calculate ISO 180 Impact Strength (extkJ/m2 ext{kJ/m}^2):
Cross-Section Area=0.00320×0.01016=3.2512×105 m2\text{Cross-Section Area} = 0.00320 \times 0.01016 = 3.2512 \times 10^{-5}\text{ m}^2 Impact StrengthISO=2.10 J3.2512×105 m2=64,591.5 J/m2=64.59 kJ/m2\text{Impact Strength}_{ISO} = \frac{2.10\text{ J}}{3.2512 \times 10^{-5}\text{ m}^2} = 64,591.5\text{ J/m}^2 = 64.59\text{ kJ/m}^2

5. Industrial Applications

  • Automotive Bumper Compound Validation: Polypropylene-EPDM tough impact testing at 30circextC-30^circ ext{C} in Chennai auto testing lab. (Illustrative Indian industry scenario based on automotive polymer testing).

6. Key Takeaways & Glossary

  • Notch Sensitivity: Susceptibility of material to brittle fracture caused by stress concentration at sharp notch roots (R=0.25extmmR = 0.25 ext{ mm}).
  • DBTT: Ductile-to-Brittle Transition Temperature where impact strength drops sharply.

7. Sources & Standard References

  1. ASTM D256-23 — Standard Test Methods for Determining the Izod Pendulum Impact Resistance of Plastics, ASTM.
  2. ISO 179-1:2023 — Plastics — Determination of Charpy impact properties, ISO.

Impact Testing: Izod vs Charpy Pendulum Dynamics & Fracture Mechanics · Engineering Triad

Material Synthesis · Processing Hardware · Commercial Application

ASTM / ISO Aligned
1. MaterialResin / Chemistry

Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS)

Poly(acrylonitrile-co-butadiene-co-styrene) Terpolymer

Izod Impact (Notched):180–300 J/m
Heat Deflection (0.45MPa):92–98 °C
Tensile Yield Strength:42–50 MPa
Rockwell Hardness:R 105–112
Morphology: SAN Matrix with dispersed Polybutadiene rubber graft spheres
2. Machine & MouldShop Floor

Computerized Servo-Universal Testing Machine (UTM 50kN)

Dual-Column Testing Rig with Video Extensometer

Crosshead Speed:50 mm/min (ASTM D638)
Gauge Length:50.0 ± 0.1 mm
Load Cell Precision:Class 0.5 (±0.5% accuracy)
Temperature Chamber:23.0 ± 2.0 °C / 50% RH
Tooling: Pneumatic Wedge Action Grips with Diamond-Serrated Jaw Faces
3. Real ProductApplication

Consumer Electronics Enclosures & Crash Helmets

Dimensional stability & high impact absorbing protective shells

Standard:ASTM D638 / ASTM D256 / ISO 178 / IS 4151
Resin Grades: LG Chem ABS AF312, INEOS Styrolution Terluran GP-22
Section 05 · Knowledge Check

Test Your Conceptual Understanding

In polymer science and processing thermodynamics, which factor most directly controls the critical transition temperature?

Select the correct option to verifyTake Complete Topic Assessment →
Summary Cheat Sheet & GATE Takeaways
  • Always evaluate molecular weight distribution (MWD) alongside zero-shear viscosity when calculating mold shear rates.
  • Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) provides $T_g$, $T_c$, and $T_m$ to define optimal processing temperatures.
  • Comply with ASTM D638 / ISO 527 tensile specimen sizing to prevent premature necking artifacts.
Share with Study Group:
Found this useful?
Share with your batch
WhatsApp
📝

Personal Lesson Notes

Please sign in to write and save notes during lessons